“Like any powerful tool, while it is considered to be the key to changing our lives by some, others may consider it to be a weapon of mass destruction.”
“The power of literature over communities and societies cannot be denied. Good literature is able to plant something in the minds of individuals, which may unify and form masses that can start revolutions, overthrow dictators, change laws and tradition and reshape the future. That “something” is an idea and there is no doubt that literature is the most efficient way to get that idea out there and plant it into minds.”
… “there was a time [...] when books were considered to be enough “evidence” to arrest young people and imprison them for the crime of being corrupt and even an enemy of the state. There was a time [...] in the course of the world’s history, when books were read, hastily devoured, then burnt or buried deep in the ground, like dead bodies, with the fear of getting captured, thrown into prison, tortured and perhaps even murdered.”
“We have already begun to forget our past and literature’s divorce with politics had a lot to do with this collective amnesia”
“There is an unholy practice to bring fundamentalism, capitalism and even politics into literature and culture. Literature goes beyond any religion, politics and capitalism. The purpose of literature is to bring positive change. If that is not done, the next generation will be misled.”
…”literature and activism are the two faces of the same coin” … “Both these elements are interlinked. The very purpose gets defeated if even one element is lost. Let us resolve not to receive any award or accept invitation by individuals, organizations or even the government which encourage communalism and fundamentalism directly or indirectly.”
“The early writers and poets used literature as a weapon to fight against social evils. But that does not largely happen now. Market-driven society and anti-social issues have hijacked the very essence of literary works”…
Posted in spywriter
Tagged Activism, awards, Books, Capitalism, Change, Consumerism, Culture, Literary, Literature, market economy, Politics, Reading, Religion, Writers, Writing
“In all the academic fluff that is thrown at us when high-brow people start blabbing about the importance of reading, this is never mentioned”:
“a book is a much better babysitter than any toy, television, tablets, Xbox or Playstation.”
Early start at reading leads to a better society:
“Reading helps to keep our prisons in check. Neil Gaiman, writing in The Guardian says how in America they easily predict prison growth on a simple algorithm based on the percen-tage of 10-year-olds couldn’t read. The lower the percentage of child read-ers, the more crowded the prison cells will be in future.”
More importantly still:
“Reading helps us to keep our politicians in check. Because we’ll know what’s happening around the world, and we’d have read the historical precedents, then, we’ll be able to tell our politicians what we want and we’ll be able to rise above party politics and aim for a common humanity.”
Continue reading: http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20131117/opinion/A-fairy-tale-a-day-does-keep-ignorance-at-bay.495053
“Literature becomes important in arousing emotions and invoking and stressing some morality or even inculcating some attitude in the reader.”
It can be an effective tool for change.
“Why is literature so powerful as a tool for change? It is because literature is in a very reflective nature, brings about social-political awareness and guides morality of the society by repudiating societal wrongs and upholding what is right. …
Aristotle asserts that more philosophical than history in that whereas history deals with the past, literature deals with what might happen; the general probable – useful to sociologists, historians and philosophers. It is universally accepted that cognitive value in drama and novels is psychological – the human element makes it thus. Other utilities include preservation and creating continuity in the ways of life of societies.”
SpyWriter Jack King, Author of:
The Black Vault www.amzn.to/Na7QRO
The Fifth Internationale www.amzn.to/snl4w1
Interviewer: The question of combining politics and fiction has engaged a good many critics, often drawing from them the notion that it’s very difficult to mix the two.
John Dos Passos: Well, I don’t know. Recently, I’ve been calling my novels contemporary chronicles, which seems to fit them rather better. They have a strong political bent because after all—although it isn’t the only thing—politics in our time has pushed people around more than anything else. I don’t see why dealing with politics should harm a writer at all. Despite what he said about politics in the novel being “the pistol shot at the opera,” Stendhal also wrote contemporary chronicles. Or look at Thucydides. I don’t think his history was at all damaged by the fact that he was a political writer. A lot of very good writing has been more or less involved in politics, although it’s always a dangerous territory. It’s better for some people to keep out unless they’re willing to learn how to observe. It is the occupation of a special kind of writer. His investigation—using blocks of raw experience—must be balanced. Sartre in his straight, plain reporting was wonderful. I can’t read him now. A writer in this field should be both engaged and disengaged. He must have passion and concern and anger—but he must keep his emotions at arm’s length in his work. If he doesn’t, he’s simply a propagandist, and what he offers is a “preachment.”
SpyWriter Jack King || “A new King of thrillers on the horizon” || Author of Political Thrillers || http://www.SpyWriter.com
“Politics or religion cannot unite, they only divide people. Only literature can act as a binding force… language may be regional but literature is universal. Language is not a barrier, it is our strength” … Books are “treasure houses of words … literature ignites culture. A writer begins the book and the reader finishes it. I think all books are left incomplete, as a writer takes the reader into the subject and leaves him to draw his own conclusion”…
… whereas politics and religion offer divisive demagoguery.
SpyWriter Jack King Official WebPage, Facebook, and Twitter
We read fewer novels.
“It’s not that the quality of fiction has gone downhill. It hasn’t …
Our attitude towards entertainment has changed, as has what we expect from a book. That’s too bad, because we’re missing something when we don’t read fiction. To have politicians who don’t read novels is particularly serious.
A good book is a window into how we as humans act and think. It makes us consider our own lives and those of people around us. Good writers introduce us to characters who, if they existed, would be unknowable by their local politicians. It’s an indirect way of learning about our world.
A non-fiction book can educate us about the newest science on climate change or homelessness or psychology. But if you pick up a (non-fiction) book by a psychologist named Daniel Kahneman, you’ll read that humans learn about abstract concepts and statistics better when they’re told a story, rather than handed a stack of facts and figures.”
Politicians! Get to know and understand the peoples of the world before you decide to bomb them. Read!
Presidents are chosen, but not elected. The Black Vault. http://www.SPYWRITER.com
“I have a sense of people thinking it (literature) is less important,” he told Reuters on Friday in a wide-ranging interview at Waterstone’s book store in central London.
“If you look at America, for instance, there is a generation older than mine in which writers like Susan Sontag and Norman Mailer and Gore Vidal would have a significant public voice on issues of the day. Now there’s virtually no writers.
“Instead you have movie stars, so if you are George Clooney or Angelina Jolie then you do have the ability to speak about public issues … and people will listen in a way they would once listen to Mailer and Sontag. That’s a change.”
He added that in authoritarian countries the situation was different, and literature had held on to some of its power.
“In those places literature continues to be important as you can see by the steps taken against writers,” he said, counting China among them.”
WikiJustice: WikiLeaks meets Jack London’s The Assassination Bureau, Ltd. http://www.SPYWRITER.com
Posted in spywriter
Tagged Angelina Jolie, Books, George Clooney, Literature, Novels, People, Politics, Reading, Salman Rushdie, Society, TV, Writers
THE BLACK VAULT is any spy agency’s most prized possession – those dirty and unaccountable funds that provide operational freedom outside of governmental scrutiny. They fund black operations – the stuff too dirty for any government to admit to.
How is the black vault funded, and what purpose does it serve?
“In the past, the CIA has been implicated in numerous scandals involving drug and weapons trafficking. From Vietnam and Iran to Latin America, the agency has repeatedly been caught importing narcotics and exporting arms for shadowy and subversive purposes.”
“Citing an unnamed CIA source, a Washington Times article theorizes that U.S. officials were actively aiding organizations such as the Sinaloa cartel with guns and immunity in an effort to stymie Los Zetas. That’s because, according to the piece, the powerful and brutal criminal Zetas syndicate has the potential to overthrow the government of Mexico — and might be planning to do so.”
What are black operations? What is the Black Vault? How is The Black Vault used? This, and more, in Jack King’s new thriller novel: THE BLACK VAULT
- The black vault
### END OF POST ###
Posted in spywriter
Tagged Books, CIA, Drugs, Espionage, Mexico, Narcotics, Politics, Reading, The Black Vault, Thrillers, Writers, Writing
“The best place for a writer is to remain on the fringes of society so as to keep a clear head, maintain alertness and avoid becoming another victim of the political propaganda apparatus…
Any political ideology serves politics … while it is impossible for writers to separate themselves entirely from society, they should avoid meddling in politics.
Literature and arts … should be a wakeful observation of the world and present the doubts one has about the world, not to negate it…
However, this is not to “entirely deny the value of having a person from literary circles in government … the example of Andre Malraux, who made a great contribution to culture and the humanities when he was French minister of cultural affairs.”
Stendhal had a different take:
“Politics in a work of literature is like a gunshot at a symphony, it adds an element of thugness and simplicity, and yet we cannot ignore it. Although for many reasons we would prefer to remain silent about some of the subjects discussed herein, unfortunately we must talk about these nasty things.”
### END OF POST ###